Phillies Chairman David Montgomery Passes Away at 72
Vigneault Announces Roles for Flyers Assistant Coaches

Eagles, Blake Countess Restructure Deal, Make Andrew Sendejo Expendable

Embed from Getty Images

By Paul Bowman, Sports Talk Philly Editor

While this might not seem like big news on the surface, the affects of the move could have significant impact on the make-up of the Eagles 53-man roster in 2019.

Just a few days ago, the Eagles claimed Blake Countess off waivers.

It was a solid move that the Eagles made to create competition for the third and fourth safety positions. While many thought that Andrew Sendejo's roster spot was safe following the move, a lot has changed since then.

First of all, Reuben Frank of NBC Sports Philadelphia is reporting the team has restructured Countess' deal and added a year of team control in 2020.

The Eagles just made Countess' contract more affordable and closer to the value of Sendejo's. The team also added a year of control in 2020, meaning that they could have a young safety at an affordable price for the next two seasons rather than a veteran for just 2019.

Additionally, the compensatory pick deadline has passed. Free agents that are signed now no longer count against the compensatory pick formulas, so the Eagles fate can only change based upon them releasing a qualifying player or other teams releasing a qualifying player.

Here is where they stand now:

Eagles Compensatory Pick Chart

Free Agents Lost
Free Agents Gained
Player
New Team
AAV
Round
Player
Previous Team
AAV
Round
QB Nick Foles Jacksonville Jaguars $22,000,000 3
WR Golden Tate New York Giants $9,350,000 4
LB Jordan Hicks Arizona Cardinals $9,000,000 4 LB L.J. Fort Pittsburgh Steelers $1,633,333 7
WR Jordan Matthews San Francisco 49ers $1,800,000 7 S Andrew Sendejo Minnesota Vikings $1,300,000 7

The only way the Eagles get a second fourth-round compensatory pick in the 2020 draft is the release of linebacker LJ Fort, who is under team control for up to three seasons, or Sendejo. If Jordan Matthews fails to make the 49ers, who drafted two receivers in the 2019 draft, the team would need to release both to get those fourth-round compensatory picks.

The question that the franchise will have to answer now is essentially this: Does having Andrew Sendejo as the fourth safety provide more to the team as an upgrade over Tre Sullivan or Blake Countess than a fourth-round pick?

If you'd like, you could think about it like a trade. Should the team essentially trade a fourth-round pick in the 2020 draft for Sendejo to be the third or fourth safety?

That question will make one of the toughest competitions in training camp even more interesting as Sendejo will have to show a lot to prove he is worth the spot, but neither Tre Sullivan nor Countess is guaranteed a spot. Add in Temple UDFA Delvon Randall and the recently claimed Godwin Igwebuike, and that will be a fierce competition for just two, maybe three, spots.

For what it's worth, I projected that the Eagles would keep Tre Sullivan and Blake Countess around as the third and fourth safeties last week in my way-too-early 2019 Eagles roster and practice squad projections. This move, added to the reasons discussed in my way-too-early projections, only seems to further the likelihood of Countess playing a major role on this team in 2019 (and now 2020).

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)